New Academy Award Categories (pt 2)

January 22, 2010

My one entry on New Oscar Categories just wasn’t enough.  Here are a few more ideas: Read the rest of this entry »


New Academy Award Categories (part 1)

January 19, 2010

Each year as Oscar season rolls around I find myself less and less interested in who wins.  And I realize that part of the problem is that not only have movies gotten worse, but the awards themselves seem less and less relevant.  Best Picture?  Best Screenplay?  How many many truly valid contenders are there each year anyway?  I think the Academy needs to loosen up a bit and add some new awards that truly reflect the state of filmmaking in the 2010′s.

I propose (nominate?) these new categories: Read the rest of this entry »


My Top 5 Favorite Steroid Confessions

January 14, 2010

In light of ex-Cardinal slugger Mark McGwire’s admission this week that he used steroids during his baseball career I thought I’d review some of my favorite steroid admissions of the last few years.  Because, as we’ve discovered, when, why and how to admit to taking steroids has become an artform unto itself: Read the rest of this entry »


Year-End Top Ten Lists

December 31, 2009

Apparently journalism ends December 26th. What do we get after that? Year end lists. So in the spirit of the season:

Top Ten Things I Hate about Top Ten Year-end lists: Read the rest of this entry »


The REAL Top 10 Most Fascinating People of 2009

December 10, 2009

Every year Barbara Walters tapes her 10 Most Fascinating People special and every year I find her choices uninspiring (although I always enjoy when she picks celebs that sound funny filtered through her unique, Elmer Fudd-esque speech impediment.  2008 was a particularly enjoyable year: “Tom Cwoose!  Pwesident-Ewect Obama!”  And whoever convinced her to pick “Mywee Cywus” is a genius in my book)

2009′s list, just announced, is filled with mostly duds:  Tyler Perry?  Michael Jackson’s children?  Jenny Sanford (Who???? Ohhh, S.C. Governor Sanford’s wife.  Really? How fascinating can she be if her husband traveled over 5,000 miles just to cheat on her?)

Barbara seems to be a little confused.  Famous hardly makes you fascinating (for proof of this, look no further than her #7 choice, Kate Gosselin.  Another person best known for being cheated on.)

So I’ll cut to the chase.  In response to Ms. Walter’s yearly misfire, I’ve devised my own 10 Most Fascinating list: Read the rest of this entry »


Oprah

December 3, 2009

MY GRADE:

Let me start by being completely candid about today’s blog topic:

Oprah scares the shit out of me.

There.  I’ve said it.

It’s not that she’s a bad person.  Clearly her heart is in the right place and she has attempted to do much good for the world.

I just don’t think any one person should be so famous.  Or influential.  Or powerful.  Or RICH.

Oprah has a net worth of $2.7 billion.

(Here’s a simple test everyone should take every 6-8 months: Round down your net worth by $700 million dollars.  If you are still left with $2 billion dollars there is a good chance  YOU HAVE TOO MUCH MONEY)

And I also happen to think… well… okay, let me stop hemming and hawing.  I’ll say it directly to her…

Oprah, sometimes I think you’re just a wee bit out of control.

Let’s list a few of the “highlights” of your highly successful television program:

  • Oprah lets Jenny McCarthy on her show to parade her anti-vaccine theories without making her defend any of her celebrity nuttiness with scientific evidence.
  • Oprah parades Suzanne Somers on her show to explain something called “hormone replacement therapy.”   In the blink of an eye,  Three’s Company becomes only the second-stupidest thing Ms. Somers has ever been involved with on television.
  • Oprah interviews the lady whose face was ripped off by a chimp — which I guess is legit, seeing how face-ripping chimps have become such a pressing national concern.
  • Oprah buys everyone in her audience a Pontiac.  She pays for them with cash.  From her wallet.
  • Tom Cruise jumps up and down on Oprah’s couch and refuses to stop until Oprah proclaims that he’s most definitely not gay.
  • Oprah mistakenly promotes James Frey’s work of fiction, One Thousand Luft Balloons (or something like that) as a memoir.  (In Oprah’s defense, Frey did jump up and down on her couch and insist that he really was a heroin addict)
  • Oprah starts a book club. Every title she selects rockets to the top of  the best seller list.  (None of those books involve sullen teenage vampires so she gets points for that)
  • Oprah launches Dr. Phil.  Sadly, she doesn’t launch him into outer space.
  • Oprah starts her own magazine. Which she names O.  Which is short for… Oprah.  Which unearths the rarely debated issue “Who names a magazine after themselves?”  It’s one thing to start a magazine.  It’s another to give it your name.  Oprah, do you realize you named an inanimate object after yourself?  Does anyone else find this as disturbing as I do?  It’s as if I baked a tuna casserole and decided to call it “David.”

So here’s my point.   Oprah, I think sometimes you have trouble discriminating between noble, altruistic, helpful notions and typical daytime talk show dreck.

<sigh.  exhale>

Phew. Glad I got that off my chest.  But here’s the hypothetical scenario I fear:

Oprah reads this blog entry (I realize we’re going way past hypothetical and into the realm of science fiction).  She doesn’t like it.

You will know when/if this ever happens because this website will no longer be functioning.  And the internet will be shut down entirely.  And hired goons will have confiscated everyone’s computer across the United States.  And a chimp will be captured, shipped from Africa, and trained solely for the purpose of  ripping my face off.

So really this brings up the question — what the hell was I thinking?

Oprah? LOVE LOVE LOVE HER!!!

Keep up the good work, O!!!  Don’t change a thing!!!

er… I mean…

Share


Baby Einstein

November 13, 2009

MY GRADE: starblankblankblankblank

einstein_baby

There seems to be a split in the world of parenting…

Back when I was growing up, most parents did stuff pretty much the same things:  you fed your kid, you changed their diaper, you let them go down the street to play with the neighbor kids, you made sure they did their homework, you told then not to run into traffic.  Occasionally a kid lost a finger playing with firecrackers, but hey, with that sort of intelligence it’s safe to assume they weren’t going to become a world renown brain surgeon anyway.

Read the rest of this entry »


The Swine Flu Scare

November 10, 2009

MY GRADE: starstarstarblankblank

charlotte's web

It’s no fun getting sick.  And swine flu can be deadly.    But I happen to think in a roundabout way swine flu is serving a larger purpose.

How?

Read the rest of this entry »


DJ’s as “artists”

November 4, 2009

MY GRADE: starstarhalfblankblank

club_dj

I have to go into this one prepared.  Because I don’t want to come across as old and stodgy (good luck).  So I decided before I attempted to debunk the whole “djs are artists” mythos I’d do a little research.

Yes, I understand “DJing” these days implies a little more than just cuing up Steely Dan records at an oldies radio station and giving the weather report. But at some point in the past 10 some-odd years it’s become a media cliche that the very best club DJing was an “artform.”

Now surprisingly, there’s very little I’ve been able to dig up online that really attempts  to break down what makes DJing such a difficult, unique  and artistic skill. I would have thought that the kids with their crazy internets would love to explain to those of us in our 30′s and beyond why not learning a musical instrument is form of artistic expression. Read the rest of this entry »


Celebrity Death Hoaxes (“RIP Tom Cruise, Kanye West, Elmo…”)

October 28, 2009

MY GRADE: starstarhalfblankblank

Kanye west

"RIP Kanye West": Harmless prank or wishful thinking?

I think a rite of passage of the angsty, misunderstood teenager is the prank call.

Example: dialing up Red Lobster and ordering a cooked telephone.  (And yes, that prank call of mine was met with curious silence from my friends, just as it is now with you.  Sigh.  Nobody ever gets my Salvador Dali references)

Well, nowadays it seems we are all collectively those mischievous teenagers and the whole world is one giant Red Lobster. (I’ll take a second to allow that horrifying metaphor to truly sink in).

It’s interesting, people often praise the immediacy of the internet as its greatest asset, the way information can spread virally in a matter of seconds.  Usually they’ll reference the Iranian Twitter Protesters or the fact that back in the days of the Lincoln Assassination people in the further reaches of the country didn’t even get the news of his death for several days (although I believe the first Lincoln Assassination joke was written a mere 30 minutes after it occurred — that still-classic one-liner: “So Mrs. Lincoln, aside from what happened, how did you enjoy the play?” Unfortunately, it was told to the actual Mrs. Lincoln and was received quite poorly)

In the DSL/Live Chat/Twitter age the big question is: Is it really such a good thing to be so immediately connected to the rest of the world when the rest of the world is only telling the truth 60% of the time?

Which leads to the topic at hand: celebrity death rumors. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.